Loading... Please wait...

Proposal #1: Create a National Care Service offering a minimum standard of long term care for all older people

Social CareBy Stephen Burke

New Ideas for a Renewed Movement.

Fairer funding of care for Britain’s ageing population is one of the biggest unmet social and economic challenges to be resolved by the Labour government. The forthcoming manifesto provides a chance to ensure that older people get the care they want and need through a radical change in the way care is funded.

We are living longer, with 1.3 million people now aged 85 and over. In the next twenty years the number of people over 85 will double, raising major questions about how we provide and fund care and support for older people and their carers.

The Government has acknowledged this with a green paper on funding care in England published in July. The green paper presents some long-term proposals to pay for the better care older people and their carers urgently need, particularly for the growing number of older people with dementia, disabilities and long-term conditions.

With our ageing population and the increasing expectations of baby boomers, the current care system simply isn’t fit for the future. Older people and their families have for too long settled for inadequate, under-funded care. Their expectations of the care system have been and remain low, informed by an experience which, all too often, can be even worse. But as the debate about personalisation and choice in health and social care takes off and as new generations approach retirement, those expectations are changing.

With the Government preparing for the biggest overhaul of the system for a generation, it is time to set our sights higher. Now is the time for an ambitious vision for the reform of social care. Ambition is also important because of past failures to resolve these issues such as the Royal Commission a decade ago, and because of the scale of the problem not just in terms of funding but in developing flexible care and support that reflect the needs and wants of British society in the 21st century.
 
Bold proposals in the ‘Shaping the Future of Care Together’ green paper to end the postcode lottery in care and make paying for care fairer for everybody therefore have to be welcomed. The proposals meet many of Counsel and Care’s tests for a new system which must be simpler, fairer, consistent, transparent and flexible, meeting the needs of older people all over the country.

Creating a national care service is particularly ambitious and could put care on a par with the NHS. Making care a universal service that everyone has a stake in and everyone benefits from would certainly make a big difference. The proposal for a national care service with a universal entitlement to care and a national assessment and portability seeks to end the postcode lottery. People want to know what care will be available wherever they live and how much it will cost them.

What can’t be ducked though is that better care will cost us all more. So we need to find new ways to pay for the growing bill. But any new funding system must be fairer, simpler and transparent for all.

The green paper rules out paying for care entirely from taxation or from individuals’ own resources. It sets out three options for the state and individuals to share the costs of care in partnership, with different levels of contribution by indviduals.

Of the three funding options, I support the ‘comprehensive’ option as being the simplest way to share the risks and costs of care. Under this option, everyone would get the care they need in return for a one-off contribution. What needs to be debated is how that contribution could be made in a way that is fair. I have argued for some time that a ‘care duty’ on people’s estates would be a better way to pay for care – we already have a collection mechanism and the level of payment could reflect an individual’s wealth, rather than everyone being required to pay the same lump-sum.

How we pay for care is an issue that touches every family in the country. We simply can’t do nothing and ignore the needs of this and future generations of older people.

Stephen Burke is Chief Executive of Counsel and Care, the national charity working with older people, their families and carers to get the best care and support. www.counselandcare.org.uk.

6 Comments · Show / Hide
Leave a comment »   show trash comments ·
1) Who is going to get out more than they put in?
2) Who is going to pay in more than they get back?
tory 'killed for telling the uncomfortable truth' troll @ 50 weeks and 5 days ago
"I have argued for some time that a ‘care duty’ on people’s estates would be a better way to pay for care – we already have a collection mechanism and the level of payment could reflect an individual’s wealth, rather than everyone being required to pay the same lump-sum."

And if an individual didn't need state care but had paid for it from his/her own pocket during their lifetime, would this "care duty" still be charged upon death i.e. it becomes another tax based upon personal wealth so I get to pay for others on my death as well as throughout life?
Guy M @ 50 weeks and 6 days ago
I am afraid people have got to save for their old age.

There is a major problem.. if you are poor you do not need to, the state will provide.

And if you do save, the state takes it away before you get any state care.

The proposal is another added tax .. so that those who have saved pay more again.

Now I have no objection to a fair system but penalising saving and not forcing those who have not saved to contribute - is plainly stupid.

If this continues, I shall spend all my money or give it away so the state WILL provide...Stupid or what?

madasa fish @ 50 weeks and 6 days ago
Care for the elderly is an important issue and one that has been sadly neglected in recent years with many hospices receiving sub-standard funding (they've never sat well with "target-based funding" you see... what with 100% death in residents a sad certainty) and in many cases closing down, however like all these things it is another mouth to feed from the same pot, and as a country we therefore need to become much better at prioritising both how we distribute our national wealth, and also to debate what role families can take in the care of their elders, together with appropriate incentives to "offset" the sacrifices that would need to be made in taking this role off the state.
Jobless Dave @ 50 weeks and 6 days ago
Great idea of labours you take from the sick and the disabled to pay for the elderly, then you sit back and take money from somebody else to look after the sick and the disabled, unless your have a plan for the sick and the disabled like perhaps badges and holiday camps with gas chambers.

I'm sick of Labours great plans.
Robert phew @ 50 weeks and 6 days ago
The NHS will only survive if there is major radical change. Someone is going to have to smash a whole lot of eggs.

Health care will continue to get a more and more expensive bill for the tax payer to pick up. The 1948 model of the NHS is no longer fit for purpose.

Continued tinkering around issues like this will just see the NHS continue to die by a 1'000 cuts.
Billy Blofeld @ 50 weeks and 6 days ago
-->

Contributors

  1. Alex Smith
  2. Tim Nicholls
  3. Jack Scott
  4. Sunder Katwala
  5. Brian Barder
  6. Sonny Leong
  7. Michael Green
  8. Paul Richards
  9. Chris Cook
  10. Jag Singh
  11. Anthony Painter
  12. Cath Arakelian
  13. Amanjit Jhund
  14. Grace Fletcher-Hackwood
  15. Lewis Goodall
  16. Salome Zourabichvili
  17. Rosie Hucklesby
  18. Sam Tarry
  19. Tom Miller
  20. Jessica Asato
  21. Olly Deed
  22. James Alexander
  23. Fiona Millar
  24. Ellie Levenson
  25. Gabe Trodd
  26. Colin Burgon
  27. Richard Watts
  28. Richard Lane
  29. James Stafford
  30. Mike Katz
  31. Jeremy Corbyn
  32. Mary Honeyball
  33. Byron Taylor
  34. Mark Hanson
  35. Mike Ion
  36. Richard Murphy
  37. Julian Ware-Lane
  38. Wes Streeting
  39. Paul Burgin
  40. Bill Dewison
  41. Hadleigh Roberts
  42. LabourList
  43. Rowenna Davis
  44. Will Straw
  45. Don Paskini
  46. Jennette Arnold
  47. Robbie Erbmann
  48. Martin Tiedemann
  49. Jonathan Isaby
  50. Rebecca Hickman
  51. Hugh Goulbourne
  52. Ed Miliband
  53. Alun Michael
  54. Frances Rehal
  55. David Rodgers
  56. Douglas Alexander
  57. Ed Balls
  58. Louise Ellman
  59. Michael Stephenson
  60. Len Wardle
  61. Greg Rosen
  62. Gareth Thomas
  63. Rachel Reeves
  64. Laurie Penny
  65. Simon Fletcher
  66. VoteRed GoGreen
  67. Tom Watson
  68. Kathryn White
  69. Morys Ireland
  70. Jack Straw
  71. Andrew Lomas
  72. Graeme Cooke
  73. Andrew Neilson
  74. Stuart White
  75. Kathryn Corrick
  76. Ed Williams
  77. Bill Kerry
  78. Gisela Stuart
  79. Shamik Das
  80. Gary Kent
  81. Mathew Hulbert
  82. Gavin Hayes
  83. Rupa Huq
  84. Andrew Pakes
  85. Tom Ogg
  86. James Mills
  87. Dan McCurry
  88. Christine Quigley
  89. Huw Lewis
  90. Marie Birchall
  91. Societarian
  92. Tom Harris
  93. Harriet Yeo
  94. Andy Burnham
  95. Tom Flynn
  96. Theo Blackwell
  97. John Gray
  98. Liam Byrne
  99. Ian Adderley
  100. Paul Afshar
  101. Olivia Bailey
  102. Alex Ross
  103. Duncan Weldon
  104. Tim Cheetham
  105. Kevin Bonavia
  106. James Crabtree
  107. James Valentine
  108. Johanna Baxter
  109. Dan Wilson
  110. Rich Green
  111. Rachel Rowson
  112. James Macintyre
  113. Luciana Berger
  114. Jake Hayman
  115. James Purnell
  116. Sue Regan
  117. John Healey
  118. Mark Spiro
  119. Glenis Willmott
  120. Chris Ostrowski
  121. Andy Slaughter
  122. Hope not Hate
  123. John Prescott
  124. Mark Day
  125. John Hirst
  126. Gary Elsby
  127. Shane Mann
  128. Alastair Campbell
  129. Cherie Booth
  130. Nick Clegg
  131. You - Email us if you want to post!

View all contributors


Latest comments

BlogList


#LabourDoorstep

Update comrades on your campaigning progress at #LabourDoorstep.


LabourList on Twitter

Follow us on Twitter