By Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982
Quelling persistent rumours that President Obama has "snubbed" Gordon Brown this week, the PM has given this interview to Sky News today:
By Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982
Quelling persistent rumours that President Obama has "snubbed" Gordon Brown this week, the PM has given this interview to Sky News today:
Update comrades on your campaigning progress at #LabourDoorstep.
Does our PM not realise how undignified it appears for him to be so desperate for attention from Obama.
When we are independently strong the US stands with us.
We don't need to pander to the US to maintain them and beyond those we have a shared outlook that makes us close and Brown's attempts to get close to Obama I think harm out relationship. Better to put some distance so the American's come to us when they find they need us rather than constantly following them lapdog like.
The intonation of his voice and his body language are of someone who simply spouting the words for the media. There is no feeling of commitement or sincerity in what he is saying. He sounds and looks like a failure.
How can we hope to improve our current dreadful performance with the British people with a leader like this?
Read Martin Kettle in the Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/sep/24/labour-revival-fantasy-toast?showallcomments=true
What is ironic about the whole "special relationship" business is that America's own destiny looks set to parallel that of Great Britain post-empire, i.e., the United States now faces a future of managed decline and incremental loss of influence on the world stage. Whether this is a god thing or a bad thing is a topic for another threat.
He reminds me of a man talking about the great relationship he has with his wife, when everyone in the pub knows she's been having an affair for the last two years. It's almost pathetic in the true sense of the word.
Godon really doesnt realsie that he has now reached a point that when he says anything at all we automatically assume he's lying. Credibility spent. It's time to go.
Harold WIlson may have had his faults, but he did a good job of keeping us out of Vietnam despite us owning the US millions. I'm not aware that it particularly damaged any "relationship" in the 1970s. Of course this Labour government couldn 't wait to do the opposite.
With all that work would you say its value for money like the Eu ?
ricki
The Un is a sham , Its after oil , If not why no action on burma ? or zimbarbwe?
Its funny we have all the bodies like the Un or the Eu and we send millions of pounds there and we still have the same problems ?
ricki
for the record, obama totally and utterly snubbed you and I don't blame him
"......there were some who thought that President Obama's return of the bust of Churchill from the White House was rude. I don't know why he did that.
The comment by a member of his administration prior to the visit of GB to Washington some SIX MONTHS ago that, “There’s nothing special about Britain. You’re just the same as the other 190 countries in the world. You shouldn’t expect special treatment.†Caught a fair amount of attention."
It seems on this basis that Gordon is a tad deluded over the special relationship now we have paid off the billion's of dollar debt the USA left us with after World War 2. The US got what it wanted, the decline and break up of the English Empire which is the correct term for the 'British Empire' according to the 1707 Act of Union.
Where was the 'Special Relationship' in World War II, when the Americans early in the war saw it as great profit making opportunity via Lend Lease? They bled us absolutely white, even though we were fighting for very survival. In fact, Americans were very antipathetic to Britain during the early stages of both the first and second World wars.
Where was the 'Special Relationship' over the Suez crisis, where they forced us to abandon the action by speculating against the pound?
Where was the 'Special Relationship' over the Falkland Islands, where they put enormous pressure on us to reach a peaceful settlement, because they were fearful of a left-wing coup in Argentina if the Junta fell from power?
Where was the 'Special Relationship' when they invaded Grenada, a Commonwealth country, without even informing us?
Where was the 'Special Relationship' during the years of IRA atrocities, or when they gave Gerry Adams a visa and allowed him to raise funds on his trips to the United States?
I am not arguing the moral rights and wrongs of any of these points, just that it plainly shows that America has never cut us any special slack at all.
The 'Special Relationship' is the invention of our pathetically immature elite - more Tory than Labour it must be said - with its vastly inflated sense of entitlement: it cannot imagine a world where it does not sit at the top tables of power and influence, so invents this rubbish and humiliates and prostitutes the rest of the country in the process.
Him being awarded World Statesman of the Year is one rung below Kissinger getting the Nobel Peace prize on the WTF? ladder.
ANYWAY
Breaking news seems to be that book launch tonight will royally screw the conference agenda. If not that then Labour supporter Max Clifford is interviewing a recently sacked tongan cleaner who its alledged said she never showed Baroness Scotland any documents.
Oh dear. Brown is like a magnet for bad news
Nonetheless they our friends in the main as whatever the difficulties and differences when times have been seriously tough we have and should continue to help each other.
It would be better to forget the chimeric "special relationship" with the USA seeking to go our own way and do right in the world even if by doing so we frustrate of infuriate our transatlantic cousins. Great Britain is a sovereign state in its own right and should not seek to become the fifty-first pseudo-state of the Union. America should be a friend and an ally not a ruler and a master upon whose good will everything supposedly depends.
When it became clear that George Bush was on his way out, Brown was less keen to be seen with him
Likewise, Obama knows Brown's days are numbered........
Newly elected Presidents and P.M's don't want to be associated with failure - and why should they?